"Fundraising Is A Sales & Marketing Process In Which The Buyer Is a VC and the Product Is Equity, Why?"| VC Remote Jobs
"Fundraising Is A Sales & Marketing Process In Which The Buyer Is a VC and the Product Is Equity, Why?"| VC Remote Jobs
How's the old sales-marketing funnel works in fundraising?
👋 Hey, Sahil here! Welcome to this bi-weekly venture curator newsletter. Each week, I tackle questions about building products, startups, growth, and venture capital! In today’s newsletter, we dive into -
Deep Dive: Fund-Raising Is A Sales & Marketing Process In Which The Buyer Is a VC and the Product Is Equity.
Featured Article: Understanding Liquidation Preference With An Example.
Major News: Sam Altman's Worldcoin Project Temporarily Halted, Perplexity Reached $1 Billion Valuation, Former Twitter CEO Sued Musk For $128 Million & EU Fined Apple $2 Billion.
Best Tweet Of This Week On Startups & Technology.
VC Jobs & Internships: From Scout to Partner.
FROM OUR PARTNER
Portfolio Intelligence Platform, Vestberry For Data-Driven VCs
Picture this: Your Fund is in the middle of a fundraising round and a potential investor asks for a 'Fund performance history' before the final decision. How long does it take you to consolidate all the data and turn it into a presentable answer?
Watch this video and learn how to prepare your portfolio data, reports or analyses in minutes. Demonstrate that your team is organized and fully aware of what's happening in your Fund and making a great impression on potential investors.
PARTNERSHIP WITH US
Want to get your brand in front of thousands of founders, investors, executives, and startup operators? For details on our sponsorships, fill up this quick form and we’ll get in touch.
TODAY’S DEEP DIVE
Fundraising is A Sales & Marketing Process In Which The Buyer Is a VC and the Product Is Equity.
“Before you set out in fundraising mode, understand that -
fundraising is a sales & marketing process and needs to be managed. Somehow many first-time founders equate “sales” with something that is beneath them.
As a founder, you need to understand that -
“An investors job is to deploy capital and make a return. If you truly believe that you, your company and your products are exceptional and your company will be valuable then you’re actually doing them a FAVOR by helping them invest in your startup.
If you don’t believe in your bones that you’re amazing then it’s no wonder you don’t want to sell them on making the investment.”
Like any sale, you first need to plan your “prospects” and qualify whether or not they’d be a good fit for your product — an investment in your company. You need to figure out how much time to spend with each prospect and you need to rigorously manage your time and the calendar. This is where most founders err.
Most founders prepare a deck, ask a few friends and investors whom to meet, get a few introductions and just wing it.
As a result founders often meet the wrong investors, and waste time on those who ask for more information.
The typical VC process is as follows:
They say there are three rules in property: Location, location, location. In sales there are also three rules: Qualify, qualify, qualify.
Your entire process should be about “testing” whether your prospect has:
Interest
Authority to make a decision
Budget
Is willing to continue spending actual time with you and analyzing you. You can short-hand this as “engagement.”
If an investor isn’t engaging then they’re not suddenly going to get a term sheet. The surest sign a fund-raising process has stalled is when you aren’t getting follow-up meetings or hearing from the VC or hearing from friends that they got a phone call or email asking about you.
If engagement wanes you either need to move that VC to a lower priority or you need to find ways to improve on any of these dimensions (obviously points 2 & 3 might mean you’re meeting the wrong person in the firm).
Moving a VC from an A to a B doesn’t mean they aren’t still your top pick, it just means your chances are less likely and your extremely limited resources should be allocated elsewhere.
One of the most common question that every founder have during fundraising….
How Many Investors Should You Speak With?
Of course, there’s no exact number of VCs you should meet — these are simply guidelines.
For simplicity, assume you’ve raised some money from angels or seed investors and you’re either raising an A round or a B round of venture capital.
Start with a list of approximately 40 qualified investors. So qualified investors mean - they’re all the right: Size, geography, industry focus, capacity available and they have raised a new fund in the last 3–4 years so you know they have dry powder.
If you’re raising a round where a new lead investor would invest $5 million the VC fund must have no less than $100 million and if you’re looking for them to write $15–20 million as the lead their fund realistically should be at least $400 million. If you think you’ll have shared leads fund sizes can be slightly smaller but as a rough guideline assume most Seed/A/B VC funds wouldn’t allocate more than 5% of their fund to a first-time investment.
In terms of stack ranking - force yourself to have no more than 8–10 “A’s,” 8–10 “B’s” and the balance of 20–24 should be “C’s.”
An “A” is somebody who would be likely to invest in a company like yours and if chosen is somebody you’d be interested in working with. If you’re not likely to get Sequoia then just because they’re an amazing firm doesn’t mean they go on your A list. If you got a 3.6 GPA in high school, you might WANT to go to Stanford, but it isn’t likely, so you spend more energy on schools you’re more likely to get into. Same with VC.
The A’s are the firms you’re going to work hardest to research, hardest to find high-quality introductions to and make the most effort to engage with. To be clear — your list never stays static. If you have a mediocre meeting with a high-quality prospect and you don’t think they’re likely to lean in they drop to a B or C.
Likewise, if a firm that you don’t think is your top pick suddenly starts engaging and doing work and showing you love you might put them as an A because having an offer is important.
Should You Start with Your “Safety Schools?”
There is some debate about whether you should “test drive” with a few firms before a wider process or whether you just begin the process. People who believe the former believe that you should see the market demand before too many people know you’re “in the market.” There’s some truth in this. It’s such a small industry that if you talk with too many investors people will hear that you’re in the market and quickly know who has passed.
You first take 2 meetings with “safety schools” meaning somebody on your B list and somebody on your C list unless you already have a very strong relationship with somebody on your A list. This gives you good practice for your A meetings and you will have a sense of some likely questions, comments and concerns.
Then begin your process in earnest with up to 8–10 firms. These are the ones that you want and that you also have a realistic possibility of landing. Keeping it to 8–10 helps you manage the public information flow that will be broader if you see 20 firms and also helps you prioritize resources. You can hit a broader group in a few weeks once you know how you did with your initial meetings or perhaps if you did well you can keep your aperture narrow.
Why 8–10 and not just 3–4?
One of the most important aims of a fund-raising process is to keep similar firms at the same stage of your process. If you’re talking with too small of a set and one leans in early and offers you a term sheet and you’re not sure that it’s the firm you wanted to work with it is incredibly difficult to slow them down and say, “We need to finish our process” as you run the risk that they feel played. An investor who doesn’t feel like there is a two-way commitment will eventually walk and look for deals they perceive as a better two-way fit.
Honestly - every VC want you to come to see only me because that means I have no competition and have time to get to know you. But honestly, you should do this before you’re raising. If we feel a mutual connection then VC will make your life easier by offering you a term sheet before you’re even raising.
How Do You Know if a VC is Engaged?
The first meeting is usually with 1–2 people within the VC firm. You might start with a partner in the meeting or it might be a principal or associate. In any event, this is a “screening meeting” or as I’ve called on my graphics an “introduction” to the firm. It’s hard but not that hard to get a first meeting for talented teams who hustle. It’s infinitely harder to get a prompt* second meeting due to rigorous time management on behalf of a VCs. (* VCs will often grant you a second meeting in 9–12 months to hear a progress update).
Many VCs will appear to be super friendly in a first meeting because they are there to learn and get to know you and there’s no upside to being an asshole. Some VCs shared a detailed way why - your startup does not fit in their thesis. When I was raising funding for my consumer tech startup - one of the VCs sent me a friendly note why - my startup was not a perfect fit for their thesis.
I point out that VCs are often friendly in the first meeting because I’ve heard hundreds of founders tell me their first meeting was great only to feel ghosted when there is limited engagement following this meeting.
There is a super simple way to know if a VC is engaged. If you get a second meeting, a follow-up phone call or you know they’re doing actual work then they’re engaged. No VC spends more time evaluating your company unless they know that they at least have some interest.
This is a sales process and your job is to look for “buying signals” — remember: Qualify, qualify, qualify.
Other signs of engagement are: they ask you to meet with portfolio companies (they want feedback on your product and you), they ask you to meet a colleague, they set up a call to go through a product demo / financial walk-through, they ask to speak with customers, etc.
It is NOT necessarily engagement if they ask you to send a bunch of financial information under the guise of “analyzing your firm.” It drives me nuts but many VCs ask for all of this because they figure more data is better than less and they might as well have insight into how your numbers look. You can read more on this data part in our previous newsletter write-up.
If a VC “ghosts you” (i.e. they told you it was a great meeting but then they don’t respond to emails) DO NOT ASSUME it means they’re not engaged. Sometimes — best will in the world — people just get busy. Your job is to push politely until you either get a “soft no” or more engagement.
If you fold simply because they haven’t responded to your last two emails you won’t have success in business development, sales, press, recruiting … anything.
Every important person with whom you want to do business will sometimes go dark on you as self-preservation for other tasks they’re trying to complete.
How Do You Work the “Bottom End of the Funnel?”
Most entrepreneurs make the mistake of allocating too much time to taking new meetings or spending time on the wrong investors simply because they’ll keep meeting with you. Don’t. Keep your eye focused first and foremost on any VCs that are A’s and are in your “analysis” or “due diligence” phases. This is the green and yellow portions of my graphic above which is specifically as a reminder to you. Most entrepreneurs don’t put enough effort into these phases.
Sometimes engagement at the later stages seems to go dry. They haven’t said “no” but they don’t seem to be spending a lot of time thinking about whether to progress.
It should be obvious to you. At the end of the process is when they need to decide not only whether they want to invest $5–10 million in your company and take the personal risk of being wrong, but they’re also voting on how they might spend a considerable amount of their time for the next 5–10 years and nobody smart does this lightly.
Your job is to create reasons to spend more time with you and to draw them into engaging because the more time they’re doing work, thinking about you, spending time with you and getting their head around why this could be exciting the more likely they will bring you into a partner meeting or make a final commitment to you.
Some easy hacks to get in front of a VC again if your process stalls
Have them meet key team members they haven’t yet met — particularly if these are people whom the VC would want to know regardless of whether or not they fund your company
Show demos of products that are yet to be released. This requires you to be disciplined and not sure if it is early in the process but a quick message to a VC that says, “I’d love to show you some cool new features we’ve built in that we haven’t shown the market yet — can I get 20 minutes to swing by” is a good way to engage.
Try to create new analyses on cohorts, future revenue projections, competitor reviews, pricing studies, etc. Any information that creates a compelling next meeting is worth doing. With some pre-planning, you might even know what information you show in your first or second meeting and what fragments you save for a follow-up meeting.
Another idea is to ask whether it’s ok to meet another team member of that VC in a 1–1 session to also show them your product. You can’t ask for a generic person — it must be a named individual that has some reason for you to meet. But that’s a chance for you to “land and expand” and build more fans inside the VC firm. It doesn’t have to be a partner — every advocate on the inside is valuable.
Due diligence meetings are the hardest to secure because VCs of course know that these follow-up meetings create obligations for them and if they’re balancing five potential deals and haven’t decided whether or not you’re a fit yet then they don’t meet again easily. As a result, many entrepreneurs take the easy route of taking new first meetings because they’re easier to get, easier to prepare for (you already have a deck) and they feel like progress. Frankly, this is like running a sales campaign and when the last big push to persuade four disparate departments to back you and it starts feeling difficult, you instead start working on selling to different customers.
As dumb as it sounds, this is a very common playbook for entrepreneurs. The bottom end of the funnel is hard. Damn hard. But I’d rather see your time and energy go into creating new artefacts to share with your prospective VCs at the bottom of the funnel than just purely taking too many new meetings.
Why Marketing Helps
In the earliest stages of this post, I mentioned that fund-raising is a “sales & marketing” process but I’ve only spoken about sales. Marketing support is as critical in a fundraising process as it is in a sales campaign. If you’re ever been involved with enterprise marketing you know how important it is to have marketing collateral and to have email drip campaigns to drive re-marketing campaigns to prospects who showed interest but didn’t convert and to run PR so that you stay on top of mind.
If you accept that these marketing techniques are critical in enterprise sales then please understand that they are no less critical in fundraising. When you plan out your fund-raising process you should dedicate some tasks on your GANTT chart to marketing. When VCs are thinking about taking a second, third or fourth meeting it doesn’t hurt that they saw an article about you in the WSJ, Recode or TechCrunch. If you have a friend of the VC who is a customer of your product or an existing investor in your company and they share news of your company in their social feeds it helps to remind the VC that they need to engage.
Every VC just like every consumer of any product likes to think that we aren’t at all influenced by marketing but of course, any behavioural economist can prove to you that we are. As a founder, use this basic knowledge to your advantage.
Why You Need to Keep Feeding the “Top of Funnel”
Having pleaded with you to put more time into the bottom end of the funnel, I do want to encourage you not to completely ignore the top end of the funnel.
In some cases VCs lean into a deal, do tons of work and seemingly get so interested that they are about to submit a term sheet only to have them say “no” at the last minute. Your lead on the deal was likely sincere in his or her interest in you but possibly got shut down when seeking approval.
The problem with putting all of your eggs into this one basket is that if you do get a “no” then you don’t have a well-established pipeline of other prospects who have already gotten through a meeting or two and you end up having to go back to square one and you lose 6–8 weeks, which can be existential for some startups.
It seems obvious that you shouldn’t count on one VC whose process seems to be going well but I’ve seen so many entrepreneurs do this that I want to highlight it and remind you not to let this happen. Even if you are certain that you’re about to get a term sheet you need to keep working a few names in the top end of the funnel all of the way through a signed term sheet. Never just assume that this will come through.
I know you’re likely tired at the end of a process but it’s important to sprint through the finish line. Even if you DO get a term sheet there’s no saying you’re going to like the terms and with no pipeline behind you you’ll likely feel pressured to just say “yes.”
Summary
Fund-raising is a sales & marketing process in which the buyer is a VC and the product is equity in your company.
Any great sales & marketing campaign begins with methodical planning and any great process is run with rigorous time allocation on the most important prospects.
Because many startup founders view “running the business” as their only job and view fund-raising as something that they’re forced to do every 18 months it often doesn’t get the time, attention and resources it deserves. Indeed, fund-raising in its own right won’t make you successful, but being successful at fund-raising can give you a distinct advantage in the market against your competitors who aren’t as good at getting financed as you or have to spend more time in the market.
Plan accordingly. Fundraising is a year-round activity and never ends. Place a small amount of your monthly time allocation to this task. Outside of fund-raising periods, it should still be at least 15% of your time. It’s a large part of the job of a successful CEO.
HOW CAN I HELP YOU?
Get Your MVP In 15 Days: Have an Idea? Turn your idea into Reality. Move fast before your competitors…. Want to build a SaaS platform, mobile or web app - we are here to help you. Build Your MVP
Pitch Deck Design: We write, design and model your pitch deck into a storyteller book within 4-5 days. Get Your Storyteller Book
FEATURED POST
Understanding Liquidation Preference With An Example!
One of the most important clauses that you will find in term sheet is "Liquidation Preference" which is important for both founders & investors So What's the "Liquidation Preference"?
It is the priority that investors have in receiving proceeds from the sale or liquidation of a company In layman's terms, it means that the investors with a liquidation preference have the first right to get their money back before any proceeds are distributed to other shareholders during liquidation events.
For Example….Read More Here
Join 15500+ Founders, Investors and Startup Enthusiasts Getting Tactics To Build, Learn and Implement About Startups and Venture Capital.
THIS WEEK’S NEWS RECAP
Major News In VC, Startup Funding & Tech
Spain's data protection authority temporarily banned Sam Altman's Founded WorldCoin. Read More
Perplexity AI is nearing a funding round valuing the startup at $1 billion, double its valuation in 2 months. Read More
Four former top Twitter executives, including former CEO Parag Agrawal, have sued Elon Musk for over $128 million. Read More
Monzo, a London-based fintech company raised $430 Million from Google’s Venture Fund. Read More
Deel has acquired African-based payroll and HR software company PaySpace, marking its largest acquisition to date. Read More
→ Get the most important startup funding, venture capital & tech news. Join 10,000+ early adopters staying ahead of the curve, for free. Subscribed to Venture Daily Digest Newsletter.
TWEET OF THIS WEEK
Best Tweet I Saw This Week
Less Is MORE….
TODAY’S JOB OPPORTUNITIES
Venture Capital Jobs & Internships
Summer Venture Fellowship - Recast Capital | USA - Apply Here
Investment Analyst - Chiratae | India - Apply Here
Associate Director, People - 500 Southeast Asia | Singapore - Apply Here
Partner - 500 Southeast Asia | Kenya - Apply Here
Investment Relations Analyst - Graphene Venture | Brazil- Apply Here
Investment Associate - Maker Fund | UK - Apply Here
Associate - CV VC | Switzerland- Apply Here
Executive Assistant - Munich Re Venture - Apply Here
Investor Relations Analyst - Qualgro Partners | Singapore - Apply Here
Director - NYS Innovation Venture Capital Fund | USA - Apply Here
Venture Capital Investment Analyst/Associate - Gladd Wing Venture | USA - Apply here
Associate , Venture Studio | 25 Madison | USA - Apply Here
Summer Associate - Selva Venture | USA - Apply Here
Investment Manager -Circulate Capital | INDIA - Apply Here
Associate -City Light | USA - Apply Here
Analyst - Struck Crypto | NY - Apply Here
Analyst - Raise | France - Apply Here
→ Looking To Break Into Venture Capital?
Join our VC Crafter community and get access to daily VC job updates, VC learning resources, daily discussion sessions, 1:1 call access, worked as a scout for various VC firms, CV/Interview preparation guide and more. Don’t miss this opportunity….
Join Our Slack Community, VC Crafter To learn, network & craft a path to venture capital.
That’s It For Today! Will Meet You on Tuesday!
Happy Thursday! 🥂
Advertise || Investor Database || Break Into VC
✍️Written By Sahil R | Venture Crew Team
Great read !